The question concerned the procedure in which the collective agreement applied to disputes at the time of the settlement of the facts of the second defendant? Despite the fact that none of the parties directly addressed this issue, I believe it is essential to determine the merits of the request for reconsideration. Neither party was able to fully answer the question during the dispute. Accordingly, I have allowed the parties to present additional arguments on this point. [53] The reference of the first interviewee to a 2003/2004 is actually a reference to collective agreement 2/2001. It was not possible to refer to Collective Agreement 1/2004, since that collective agreement had already omitted the applicant`s obligation to submit a reply within a specified period. [47] With the exception of the above points, this is not a point that never arose before the second respondent.